![]() |
|
good chemistry is complicated, and a little bit messy -LW |
|
PerlMonks |
comment on |
( #3333=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
Howdy!
...and you describe exactly the kind of situation where a surrogate key becomes necessary. I simply object to the terminology which implies that primary keys are, necessarily, opaque values stored in a single column. Changing the title to refer to surrogate keys would fix that.
yours, Michael In reply to Re^3: An improved technique for database primary keys
by herveus
|
|