eval " use $breed; " ;
Also, in true merlyn fashion, it looks like eval in this string context makes you have unsafe doggies if you are using your dogs on a web site and allowing input of the doggie type in a text field.
$dog = ' strict; doEvil(); ';
I also think the strange use of dog as a factory class to produce subtypes of dogs is a little odd-form from an OO form, and that most OO purists would frown on the eval and use of reflection to pick subclasses. But I come from a very non-Perlish OO background, so this is just my two cents.
In conclusion, if we want to call this a tutorial, I say this should be a tutorial on the factory pattern, not a tutorial on polymorphism. Polymorphism is a much more general concept, and we skip over that generality by starting with the factory piece first. I would be interested to see if the factory could be made without using eval, as well...I think it can, especially if the dogs were loaded previously in a more-safe matter. But hey, maybe we don't have to worry about unsafe loading of doggies -- they do allright in the back of a pickup truck usually :)
Anyway, cool stuff, just a few ideas thrown out here. *yelp*.
|Replies are listed 'Best First'.|
Re: Re: •Re: It's a dog, but what kind? (polymorphism , in Perl OO)
by hardburn (Abbot) on Mar 23, 2004 at 21:17 UTC
by flyingmoose (Priest) on Mar 24, 2004 at 00:43 UTC
by hardburn (Abbot) on Mar 24, 2004 at 14:10 UTC