http://www.perlmonks.org?node_id=614739


in reply to Re^3: What's wrong with Perl 6?
in thread What's wrong with Perl 6?

jdporter is correct. I guess I should have left in the paragraph where I mention that I've consumed the Perl 6 Kool-aid and have been keeping close watch on Perl's future (beyond 5.x) since before Perl 6 even existed (Who else remembers Topaz? :-)

No worries though.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: What's wrong with Perl 6?
by cog (Parson) on May 11, 2007 at 09:10 UTC
    A-ah! Everything makes sense now.

    In that case, I stand corrected, I apologize for any rudeness and I cheer your effort! :-)

    Anyway, maybe you can use my previous comments in the answers you'll compile.

    Cheers :-)