http://www.perlmonks.org?node_id=461103


in reply to Maypole in 2005

I think Catalyst has all of the things of Maypole and is under active develpoment.



This is not a Signature...

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Maypole in 2005
by ank (Scribe) on May 27, 2005 at 21:08 UTC

    I was exactly in your position 4-5 months ago, and we ended up going with Catalyst.

    I have been using Catalyst for a real world project with 4 programmers - we had to freeze the Catalyst code because the Catalyst developers wouldn't stop changing things around - in the 3 months since our project started, Catalyst has grown from version 4.8 to 5.2, and part of the interface has been extensively modified.

    However, I must say that Catalyst is a a great package -- we just had to stop the upgrade madness and keep using what we knew was stable. We feel very confortable with Catalyst -- although at some points it felt like we were the only ones working on a real world project with it -- in the end it really helped us and it's been working great. I must also say that the Catalyst devs are great people - and the project is being worked on almost 24/7.

    We are planning on upgrading to the latest catalyst asap - but first we are going to do some extensive testing.

    Just my $.02