Re^2: Tied Hashes vs. Objects

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Tied Hashes vs. Objects by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Oct 22, 2012 at 21:31 UTC
As it had been a long time since I'd performed this kind of benchmark, I did one: <Reveal this spoiler or all in this thread> The results: `__END__ C:\test>b-tieHash.pl 8376437/16777216 std hash usage took: 56.582 seconds 8376437/16777216 tied usage took: 210.352 seconds 8376437/16777216 Object usage took: 126.642 seconds` [download] show that using the object interface saves 1 microsecond per key, spread across all 5 operations performed on each key/value, Say 1/5th of a microsecond (0.0000002) per operation. You need to be doing billions of hash operations -- with almost no other associated processing -- for that to become a significant part of your time costs. With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday' Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error. "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice. RIP Neil Armstrong	[reply] [d/l] [select]
Re^4: Tied Hashes vs. Objects by tkemmer (Initiate) on Oct 23, 2012 at 07:03 UTC
Thank you very much for your effort! At least to me, this really busts the "Tied Hashes are Expensive" myth, so the decision whether to use tied hashes or an object interface should definitely not be based on performance, but rather on matters of style and clarity. Thanks again!	[reply]


Perl: the Markov chain saw
	PerlMonks