Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
The stupid question is the question not asked

Re^3: Thread safe equivalent of LINUX touch command

by space_monk (Chaplain)
on Nov 22, 2012 at 23:04 UTC ( #1005196=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re^2: Thread safe equivalent of LINUX touch command
in thread Thread safe equivalent of LINUX touch command

Why not? AFAICT, if one thread touches a file then it will succeed, and if another thread tries to touch a file, then it too will succeed. There is nothing wrong in both threads succeeding and I don't think there is any lock issues apart from the actual creation of the file and/or setting of the modification date, which are probably operating/filesystem issues and should be thread safe in any event.
A Monk aims to give answers to those who have none, and to learn from those who know more.
  • Comment on Re^3: Thread safe equivalent of LINUX touch command

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Thread safe equivalent of LINUX touch command
by BrowserUk (Pope) on Nov 22, 2012 at 23:20 UTC
    Why not?

    Because the module modifies multiple pieces of data (times) in a non-atomic manner, with no synchronisation or locking.

    (Stop guessing and look at the **&*%$ code!)

    With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
    Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
    "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
    In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.

    RIP Neil Armstrong

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1005196]
and all is quiet...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others romping around the Monastery: (8)
As of 2018-06-19 10:56 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    Should cpanminus be part of the standard Perl release?

    Results (113 votes). Check out past polls.