http://www.perlmonks.org?node_id=940843


in reply to Re: We should elminate: Anonymous, and DOWN-voting
in thread We should elminate: Anonymous, and DOWN-voting

This node was taken out by the NodeReaper on Nov 30, 2011 at 14:49 UTC
  • Comment on Reaped: Re^2: We should elminate: Anonymous, and DOWN-voting

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: We should elminate: Anonymous, and DOWN-voting
by dreadpiratepeter (Priest) on Nov 30, 2011 at 14:15 UTC

    First of all Simon, you are the single most non-anonymous Anonymous poster on the site. Your combination of delusion, paranoia and hate-mongering is unmistakable.

    Secondly, anyone can look back at the history of my posts to see what I have said to you. I stand by it. It was not anonymous. They can also see that I never once resorted to threats or profanity to make my point.

    And thirdly, I would have no problem saying it to your face. However, I know your type and I am sure that if this were a real conversation you would not be spouting off like you do from the safety of the computer. Consider this an attack if you will, but you are nothing more than a childish internet bully using this forum to have your temper-tantrums



    -pete
    "Worry is like a rocking chair. It gives you something to do, but it doesn't get you anywhere."
[reply]
Re^3: We should elminate: Anonymous, and DOWN-voting
by CountZero (Bishop) on Nov 30, 2011 at 13:51 UTC
    And therefore you say such things as an Anonymous Monk. I pity you.

    CountZero

    A program should be light and agile, its subroutines connected like a string of pearls. The spirit and intent of the program should be retained throughout. There should be neither too little or too much, neither needless loops nor useless variables, neither lack of structure nor overwhelming rigidity." - The Tao of Programming, 4.1 - Geoffrey James

[reply]
    A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.

In Section Perl Monks Discussion