... And suggesting an alternative would not be wrong either. Moreover,Win32::IE::Mechanize is just Like "the mech" but with IE as user-agent. Period...
If you tell me, I'll forget.
If you show me, I'll remember.
if you involve me, I'll understand.
--- Author unknown to me
| [reply] |
But you didn't actually suggest it as an alternative :)
Mechanize doesn't support javascript, while iexplore does support javascript -- pretty much the only reason folks use iexplore when they can
| [reply] |
"...But you didn't actually suggest it as an alternative :).."
Maybe you need re-read my Original Post, where I stated it clearly that Using your OP, I don't have Win32::IE::Mechanize, installed so I used WWW::Mechanize. Infact, I started answering by saying "Why not use ..." Please, how more suggestive can I be?
"Mechanize doesn't support javascript,.." That is an open secret
"..while iexplore does support javascript.." So, do WWW::Mechanize::Firefox. There always an alternate. Moreover, the OP didn't say he MUST use Win32::IE::Mechanize. Did he/she? :)
If you tell me, I'll forget.
If you show me, I'll remember.
if you involve me, I'll understand.
--- Author unknown to me
| [reply] |