Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
go ahead... be a heretic

Re^6: better array to hash conversion (wrong metric)

by tye (Sage)
on Dec 11, 2012 at 16:44 UTC ( #1008337=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re^5: better array to hash conversion
in thread better array to hash conversion


In the unlikely event of having hundreds of thousands of entries, the run-time will be a fraction of a second faster (and nobody will notice or care). In the very unlikely event of this particular operation being even as much as 10% of the total run-time, the difference between the worst and the best shown so far will result in a 5% reduction in total run-time (which nobody will notice or care about).

- tye        

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^7: better array to hash conversion (wrong metric)
by karlgoethebier (Monsignor) on Dec 12, 2012 at 07:30 UTC

    Thank you very much and best regards, Karl

    «The Crux of the Biscuit is the Apostrophe»

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1008337]
and all is quiet...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others pondering the Monastery: (7)
As of 2018-06-22 12:29 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    Should cpanminus be part of the standard Perl release?

    Results (124 votes). Check out past polls.