Re^2: No questions. Just a "thank you for named captures" !!

Python also had named captures before Perl, but why does it matter who had it first? Or do you mean It's a shame that Perl did not support them sooner than it did?

Comment on Re^2: No questions. Just a "thank you for named captures" !!

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: No questions. Just a "thank you for named captures" !! by tobyink (Canon) on Feb 07, 2013 at 16:54 UTC
Strangely PCRE (the Perl Compatible Regular Expression engine) also added support for named captures several years before Perl. `package Cow { use Moo; has name => (is => 'lazy', default => sub { 'Mooington' }) } say Cow->new->name`	[reply]
Re^3: No questions. Just a "thank you for named captures" !! by sedusedan (Monk) on Feb 07, 2013 at 16:42 UTC
Perhaps shame is too strong a word. How about 'it would be cool if Perl came up with named capture instead of other languages, remembering that Perl was/is kind of the state-of-the-art for regex stuffs.'	[reply]


The stupid question is the question not asked
	PerlMonks