There's more than one way to do things | |
PerlMonks |
Re: Re: Re: DBI specification changeby bronto (Priest) |
on Jul 16, 2002 at 15:58 UTC ( [id://182124]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
You got a point here. My reply, anyway, was triggered by this paragraph of gmax posting... I am posting this warning because I have seen some SOPWs where people were using this particular idiom. ...and triggered that consideration of mine, which is general and not limited to DBI, that version n.m+1 shouldn't break any code that works with n.m. In case something could be broken, one should choose a new M>>m, obviously IMHO. No attempt to blame to DBI people there ;-) Ciao! Update: Edited the HTML, misplaced tag
In Section
Meditations
|
|