|
|
|
| Pathologically Eclectic Rubbish Lister | |
| PerlMonks |
RE: RE: Thoughts on voting and reputationsby ahunter (Monk) |
| on Jun 15, 2000 at 21:54 UTC ( [id://18345]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
|
Hmm, right idea, wrong reason, I feel. I think SuperCruncher's
node was misguided but not really bad enough to justify
a jihad against it. Worst nodes should get there of their
own accord - this is the reason we don't get to see
reputations before we vote on a node, and the reason for
the caveat at Best Nodes.
In Section
Perl Monks Discussion
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||