Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Perl: the Markov chain saw
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Are "PM Discussions" only to be technical?

by benn (Vicar)
on Apr 29, 2003 at 23:23 UTC ( #254143=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Are "PM Discussions" only to be technical?

I agree completely. I thought long and hard about where to post the Religion question (which is still in Discussion, isn't it?) - I was 'seeking the wisdom of the monastery', but on what felt a different level to a 'normal' SOPW post. It was a toss-up between Meditations and here, but my gut feeling was that (a) because the whole question had been sparked by my trawling homenodes, it was more a discussion of faith as expressed in the Monastery itself, rather than the wider community, and (b) it was more likely to be discussed by the more active members here - I notice no AM relies there as yet - and less likely to get trolled.

In addition, the other trigger was Your Mother's mention of Relics :)

++ to the update proposals.

Ben.

  • Comment on Re: Are "PM Discussions" only to be technical?

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://254143]
help
Chatterbox?
[Corion]: A good morning and weekstart to you too, Discipulus!
Discipulus last day of work before holidays.. He put a reminder on his cell

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others scrutinizing the Monastery: (7)
As of 2018-06-25 07:22 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    Should cpanminus be part of the standard Perl release?



    Results (126 votes). Check out past polls.

    Notices?