Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Don't ask to ask, just ask

Re: Re: E-Commerce Monks

by markjugg (Curate)
on May 17, 2003 at 13:44 UTC ( #258862=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re: E-Commerce Monks
in thread E-Commerce Monks

But before you use Interchange, you might read my explanation of why I dumped Interchange.

Note it's been a couple years and I'm not sure what's changed with Interchange.

My current bias that I tend to write smaller e-com applications and the re-usable applications I find tend to be "too much" and are harder than needed to work with and maintain because of the additional complexity.

Although e-commerce is complex, it's a collection of things are all fairly straightforward these days: using a database, session handling and posting over SSL. Definitely because ther are financial transactions involved, I think there is more of emphasis (and programmer fear!) of quality control and "getting it right".

In my own cases I've found that custom solutions have been a good fit to build and maintain.

That said, I would happily consider adopting an e-commerce package if it used some my favorite tools:

CGI::Application, HTML::Template, Data::Pageset, SQL::Abstract, and Postgres

The right fit for me would allow me to use just the bits I need when I want them, and also have more power there when I need it....much like a collection of fairly independent Perl modules. :)


Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: E-Commerce Monks
by perrin (Chancellor) on May 19, 2003 at 04:39 UTC
    These are very valid criticisms and I agree with most of your sentiments. I've never used Interchange, preferring to build my own with the help of CPAN, like you do. Unfortunately, it's hard to find a better fully-working example e-commerce app in Perl. Zelerate is not good. Do you have any other suggestions for things we can point people at when they need an example?
Re: Re: Re: E-Commerce Monks
by Alexander (Sexton) on May 20, 2003 at 17:37 UTC
    I had spent some time on Interchange several weeks ago and encountered obsticle after obsticle until I finally threw my hands up and shelved it.

    All I know of it is what I have seen in the demos. On preliminary inspection, it looks impressive, but I have yet to make a successful install. I may look into it again if only to satisfy the lingering questions of it's viability I still have. For now, I will reserve judgement.

    One thought which I cannot help to ponder is that Interchange is put out by Redhat. Redhat's angle is ease of installation, yet in my experience with Interchange so far, it is not an easy install. Granted the documentation and reviews I have seen are upfront that it has a steep learning curve... at what point are the benefits of Interchange outweighed by it's steep learning curve?

    For me, it is currently a time consideration. As long as I can satify my minimal requirements and keep away from security pitfalls, I'll take the least line of resistance for now. Who knows, by the time I am ready to consider taking Interchange off the proverbial shelf, there will be something better, or I will have advanced far enough to write something myself.

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://258862]
and all is quiet...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others perusing the Monastery: (5)
As of 2018-06-25 03:30 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    Should cpanminus be part of the standard Perl release?

    Results (126 votes). Check out past polls.