Yes, sure you can roll your own HTML.
If you do that, you do not need the HTML functions of CGI.pm and you can replace CGI.pm by CGI::Simple (less overhead and faster).
CountZero
"If you have four groups working on a compiler, you'll get a 4-pass compiler." - Conway's Law
CGI::Simple slower than CGI?
by epoptai (Curate) on Dec 30, 2003 at 01:50 UTC
|
I took your advice and plugged CGI::Simple::Standard into a current project and found it consistently about 1/10 to 2/10 of a second slower than standard CGI. Current versions of both modules on activestate. Changing one line changed the output from times():
#use CGI qw(Vars param header redirect);
use CGI::Simple::Standard qw(Vars param header redirect);
--
perl -MO=Deparse -e"u j t S n a t o e h r , e p l r a h k c r e"
| [reply] [d/l] |
|
| [reply] |