neshura said:
I follow certain guidelines on voting, I don't know if
anyone else does. Mine are (1) I vote if I understand enough
to solidly agree or disagree, or (2) I don't vote.
I wholeheartedly agree on voting guidelines. Here are mine:
- Is this post helpful to the Perl Monks community?
- if ($Post == $Question){
'Is it a thoughtful question?
Well-presented? Does it give a chance to show off
some cool feature of Perl?'
}
- if ($Post == $AnswerToQuestion){
'Was it helpful to all users?';
'Was it cool and/or simple to understand?';
'Does it point to a useful module on CPAN?';
}
- if ($Post == $Suggestion){
'Do I like it and want to show support for the idea?';
'Is it well-reasoned and appreciatively requested?';
}
- if ($Post == $RunningThread or $Post == $SemiFlameWar){
'Does this post address a useful programming issue
("Will at least some users benefit from this
discussion (even if it is a bit heated)?")';
# Arguments are not bad, if they address a meaningful topic
}
- if ($Post =~ /Clever | Witty | Entertaining/) { $Vote++ }
- Is this post helpful to a specific member of the Perl Monks community?
- A thoughtful answer to a question (reasonably
correct), especially if it makes a serious attempt
to be idiomatic.
- Corrected code in the post (supplying working code
as part of the answer to a problem)
- Did this post require a considerable amount of effort?
- Benchmarking to compare two approaches
- Long, thoughtful/thought-provoking
- Analysis of/rewriting a large piece of code
- Anything obviously time-consuming
Negative votes are rare from me, and only if the poster:
- Was unjustifiably hostile or negative
- Misrepresents someone's position, just to make him/her
look bad
- Is excessively arrogant (we are all somewhat arrogant,
or we wouldn't deign to post code here at all ;-)
I've only been hanging around here for a couple weeks, but
it feels like home, because of the quality and community we
foster. Voting allows us to reward those who provide
useful, meaningful content. I try to use my votes to reward
those who make Perl Monks into a quality place of help and
learning.
Russ
-
Are you posting in the right place? Check out Where do I post X? to know for sure.
-
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags. Currently these include the following:
<code> <a> <b> <big>
<blockquote> <br /> <dd>
<dl> <dt> <em> <font>
<h1> <h2> <h3> <h4>
<h5> <h6> <hr /> <i>
<li> <nbsp> <ol> <p>
<small> <strike> <strong>
<sub> <sup> <table>
<td> <th> <tr> <tt>
<u> <ul>
-
Snippets of code should be wrapped in
<code> tags not
<pre> tags. In fact, <pre>
tags should generally be avoided. If they must
be used, extreme care should be
taken to ensure that their contents do not
have long lines (<70 chars), in order to prevent
horizontal scrolling (and possible janitor
intervention).
-
Want more info? How to link
or How to display code and escape characters
are good places to start.
|