Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
No such thing as a small change

Re: To module or not?

by japhy (Canon)
on Apr 26, 2005 at 14:17 UTC ( #451581=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to To module or not?

In your case, there's not much of a problem. The reason modules (and namespaces) exist is becuse related functions belong packaged together, and you should have ability to use a function from another namespace that might end up conflicting with a function in your namespace.

If you had an add_it() function that you didn't want overwritten, you could use your module as

use MyModule; print MyModule::add_it($amount);
And when multiple modules have the same function names (this is most common with classes -- objects, I mean), they need to be able to keep their own functions separate to themselves.

Jeff japhy Pinyan, P.L., P.M., P.O.D, X.S.: Perl, regex, and perl hacker
How can we ever be the sold short or the cheated, we who for every service have long ago been overpaid? ~~ Meister Eckhart

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://451581]
[choroba]: Syntax::Construct version 1.005 released to CPAN. The main change: 5.28 support.

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others drinking their drinks and smoking their pipes about the Monastery: (6)
As of 2018-06-25 00:38 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    Should cpanminus be part of the standard Perl release?

    Results (126 votes). Check out past polls.