Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Just another Perl shrine

Re: Re: Control of Problem Members

by lemming (Priest)
on Jan 17, 2001 at 22:24 UTC ( #52567=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re: Control of Problem Members
in thread Control of Problem Members

I think this might be a good solution. I would take it slightly further.

Only allow Anon posts on the root node of SoPW & to replies of that node. So you could have:
root node by anon,
then a reply by a named monk that asks for clarification or such
Then there can be an anon reply to that.
This would allow anon monks to ask questions, but if they troll, just don't reply and in most cases it can be deleted if warranted. (yech grammar)

That would stop posts like: [no such node, ID 52589]

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://52567]
and all is quiet...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others rifling through the Monastery: (3)
As of 2018-06-25 17:14 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    Should cpanminus be part of the standard Perl release?

    Results (128 votes). Check out past polls.