Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
We don't bite newbies here... much

(OT) Re^5: NASA cracker used perl

by sir_lichtkind (Friar)
on May 08, 2006 at 16:35 UTC ( #548037=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to (OT) Re^4: NASA cracker used perl
in thread NASA cracker used perl

you simply should dig deeper, it is possible to seperate hoaxes from real items. yes most ufos are human-made but not all. even in the 70*ies the IBM material researcher Dr Marcel vorgel was gaven metal samples from ufo case of billy meyer. before camera he statet that he cant reproduce that material because it should have been assembled in some sort of cold fusion. and that was only one piece of puzzle of too many to make a joke of this subject.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
(OT) Re^6: NASA cracker used perl
by wazoox (Prior) on May 08, 2006 at 19:42 UTC
    I don't make a joke of this subject; all those credulous pimps that simply believe anything (or pretend anything, in that matter) do. I'd really like it to be a serious subject to study, unfortunately there are so many crazy gurus (Rael and co), liars and mythomaniacs that it's a dead-end for science right now, because whatever facts you may collect are buried under a haystack of bullsh*t.
      vogel was no pimp he had over 30 patents in material research and was on of the cutting edge researcher at IBM. his only became part of the case because others asked him to analyze this metal sampel. he showed it also to his colleges and all came to the same conclusion. i know there are many mislead person, everyone it is to some degree but there is definitly more truth out there than most people wants people believe. if you are real to this things you have to be patientent. most ufo videos are unfortunatly hoaxes also the ones with the obducation. but there are also some very bright man out there with much clue. and to bring this back to the topic. it is pure ignorance that the disclosure project has just eye witnesses. the have digital radar tracks, copies of classified dokuments, official unclassified material and much more. its definitly worth to check it out and make an own opinion. look these people into them eyes. most people are not rocket scientist but they can smell a liar due life experience.
(OT) Re^6: NASA cracker used perl
by gellyfish (Monsignor) on May 08, 2006 at 20:40 UTC

    Er quite, from what I can read of sources that are not firmly planted in the tinfoil-hat camp this analysis was faulty if it actually occurred at all.


Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://548037]
and all is quiet...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others browsing the Monastery: (5)
As of 2018-06-18 02:51 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    Should cpanminus be part of the standard Perl release?

    Results (107 votes). Check out past polls.