Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
No such thing as a small change

Re: Build.PL versus Makefile.PL

by xdg (Monsignor)
on Feb 07, 2007 at 05:34 UTC ( #598690=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Build.PL versus Makefile.PL

People doing smoke tests on my modules report false positives because they try to run tests that can't be run.

I believe that most smoke testers are based on CPANPLUS. CPANPLUS support for Module::Build has been (and may still be) flaky. CPANPLUS::Dist::Build was split out separate from the main CPANPLUS distribution in an attempt to improve support. The most recent release adds support for the build_requires parameter -- previously, this was the cause of numerous test failures.

If CPANPLUS-based smoke testers upgrade to the latest CPANPLUS::Dist::Build (and perhaps additional bugs are fixed), or if smoke testers switch to and CPAN::Reporter, these problems should go away.


Code written by xdg and posted on PerlMonks is public domain. It is provided as is with no warranties, express or implied, of any kind. Posted code may not have been tested. Use of posted code is at your own risk.

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://598690]
and all is quiet...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others making s'mores by the fire in the courtyard of the Monastery: (5)
As of 2018-06-24 06:13 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    Should cpanminus be part of the standard Perl release?

    Results (126 votes). Check out past polls.