Welcome to the Monastery PerlMonks

Re^4: Golf: Grocery Bagging

 on May 23, 2001 at 20:27 UTC ( #82611=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re: Re^2: Golf: Grocery Bagging
in thread (Golf) Grocery Bagging

It might, but if you're going to evaluate all possibilities, who cares? As in, if you are worried about a scenario such as the following, where the 10 gets bagged "solo" despite there being a -5 farther down the pipeline:      ( [ 9 ], [ 10, -5], [ 11 ] )
Then later on you will inevitably evaluate a scenario where the -5 is inserted earlier.      ( [ 9, -5, 10 ], [11] )
So, taking the "brute force" approach, you might lose points for style, but you get the job done, no?

Has anyone ever pointed out to a grocery checker that the bagging problem was NP-complete? The result might be similar to explaining that dogs can solve quadratic equations (i.e. capturing a frisbee in a parabolic arc while in linear motion).

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re^4: Golf: Grocery Bagging
by MeowChow (Vicar) on May 23, 2001 at 21:37 UTC
Has anyone ever pointed out to a grocery checker that the bagging problem was NP-complete?
Has anyone ever had a grocery bagger that optimally bagged their groceries? Fortunately, the greedy heuristic which baggers generally use is not NP-complete =)
```   MeowChow
s aamecha.s a..a\u\$&owag.print```

Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://82611]
help
Chatterbox?
and all is quiet...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others scrutinizing the Monastery: (5)
As of 2018-06-24 03:18 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
Voting Booth?
Should cpanminus be part of the standard Perl release?

Results (126 votes). Check out past polls.

Notices?