I don't suppose so for the following reasons:
- The code is a boil down from a larger code that displayed the same behavior.
- The Perl path at the top of this line doesn't really matter here because I am using an editor on an XP machine so the path in the first line isn't really looked into upon compiling.
The +s you see are because of a line overlap, if you hit on the download button at the left bottom of the code area you can have the entire code displayed without these +s..
UPDATE: added the missing curly and removed the backslash pointed out, that should've been a pasting mistake of my code snippet, other than that, this code works and does show the behavior mentioned in the original post
Excellence is an Endeavor of Persistence.
A Year-Old Monk :D .