Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Keep It Simple, Stupid
 
PerlMonks  

Re^4: We should ... Trouble with Ignoring/Blocking Anonymous

by MidLifeXis (Monsignor)
on Dec 02, 2011 at 19:16 UTC ( [id://941419]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^3: We should ... Trouble with Ignoring/Blocking Anonymous
in thread We should elminate: Anonymous, and DOWN-voting

I don't use it myself, so I should probably look into that. :-)

--MidLifeXis

  • Comment on Re^4: We should ... Trouble with Ignoring/Blocking Anonymous

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: We should ... Trouble with Ignoring/Blocking Anonymous
by Anonymous Monk on Dec 03, 2011 at 03:40 UTC

    It would be quite simple for the gods to alter the code to add a class attribute to table rows created by anonymous monks, which could then be set to display:none; in a custom CSS file. Of course that would require that they gave a shit, which they have clearly demonstrated they don't UNLESS the anonymonk feature is used to abuse them. (IE, it's fine for you to abuse each other with it as much as you want)

      It would be quite simple for the gods to alter the code to add a class attribute to table rows created by anonymous monks, which could then be set to display:none; in a custom CSS file. Of course that would require that they gave a shit, which they have clearly demonstrated they don't UNLESS the anonymonk feature is used to abuse them. (IE, it's fine for you to abuse each other with it as much as you want)

      Yeah, this feature is already available, and it works

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://941419]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others chanting in the Monastery: (9)
As of 2024-04-18 13:36 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found