more useful options | |
PerlMonks |
comment on |
( [id://3333]=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
It mean, that FCGI.pm MUST have properly implemented cleanup routine, Why "MUST" it? Because you said so? It DOESN'T, and there is a good reason: It makes no sense to use threads with FCGI I'm not going to explain that. YOU need to go out and read up on FastCGI and FCGI to understand why that is so. With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday'
Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
In reply to Re^5: [FCGI.pm] - not threads-safe?
by BrowserUk
|
|