http://www.perlmonks.org?node_id=941410


in reply to Re: We should elminate: Anonymous, and DOWN-voting
in thread We should elminate: Anonymous, and DOWN-voting

If you really don't want to view them, would Re: Blocking users work?

--MidLifeXis

  • Comment on Re^2: We should elminate: Anonymous, and DOWN-voting

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: We should ... Trouble with Ignoring/Blocking Anonymous
by luis.roca (Deacon) on Dec 02, 2011 at 19:13 UTC

    It does work but the threads are still there so if/when anyone else participates you'll see those nodes in Newest or Recent Threads. While I do use the blocking css you posted, I still sometimes end up stumbling into a thread I would have otherwise preferred to ignore ( like this one ;-) ).


    UPDATE
    Same Day :: 3:28 PM :: Turns out I was wrong. As long as tables are displayed as divs in the Display Settings, MidLifeXis' css works well. Apologies.


    "...the adversities born of well-placed thoughts should be considered mercies rather than misfortunes." — Don Quixote

      I don't use it myself, so I should probably look into that. :-)

      --MidLifeXis

        It would be quite simple for the gods to alter the code to add a class attribute to table rows created by anonymous monks, which could then be set to display:none; in a custom CSS file. Of course that would require that they gave a shit, which they have clearly demonstrated they don't UNLESS the anonymonk feature is used to abuse them. (IE, it's fine for you to abuse each other with it as much as you want)