Re^6: sprintf %X endianness

*sign* Is what "thing"? Cos in the OP you wrote:"00021401", but in this post you wrote: 00204110 twice. Which should I take as being your requirement?

I laid out my question in the OP. You ignored it, and then I typoed. I don't have a different machine to test if sprintf %x does the same thing on all machines.

Comment on Re^6: sprintf %X endianness

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^7: sprintf %X endianness by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on May 15, 2013 at 02:43 UTC
You ignored it, I did not ignore it. I used an example that more clearly demonstrates the process. and then I typoed. How am I supposed to distinguish which is the typo? With the rise and rise of 'Social' network sites: 'Computers are making people easier to use everyday' Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error. "Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority". In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.	[reply]
Re^8: sprintf %X endianness by Anonymous Monk on May 15, 2013 at 03:10 UTC
I did not ignore it. I used an example that more clearly demonstrates the process. Well, I kind of asked a yes/or no question, and then I got lost in your answer. On third look just use it and the code will do the right thing. seems to answer that sprintf %x will return the same string on all machines How am I supposed to distinguish which is the typo? I don't think you are, I kind of think I pointed out what I wanted when I when I realized I made the typo Thanks	[reply]
Re^9: sprintf %X endianness by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on May 15, 2013 at 04:06 UTC
seems to answer that sprintf %x will return the same string on all machines Yes.	[reply]


Perl: the Markov chain saw
	PerlMonks