Re^6: unreaping , reversing reaped, resurrecting a node

[Anonymous Monk]

or the guy who originally asked the question, an anonymous monk

[LanX]

And beech was capable to repost the "destroyed" content because he bothered to get a login.

Like Your Mother I think that reaping was too strong, but I agree with Corion that off site snippets should be discouraged. So it's a dilemma.

Personally I don't have the resources to spend much energy on educating anonymous monks, I think none of us really has. If they are regularly here they should get an account.

The system isn't perfect and we all need to compromise. So reposting the content in a proper way should solve the issue.

This was done, thanks to beech.

[beech]

Ha :)

[Your Mother]

And not to put too fine a point on it, but it was not really kosher to do; lack of consequence or not, some of us attempt to take the high road regardless. tye seems perfectly amenable to restoring the content since he sees no valid justification whatsoever for the reaping. Your approach here reeks of the social cop / thought police stuff that is the biggest detraction to participation for me personally which leads to a finer point on it: I’m more valuable than some anonymous monk who might be gone forever tomorrow or even be an SEO shill for the off-site resource for all you know. Are you going to consider discouraging my participation a valid concern?

[LanX]

> Ha :)

If you have the time and energy to always clean up misformed posts of lazy visitors, go ahead.

Ho! :)