in reply to
Re2: New simple search
in thread New simple search
Like I said, I don't want to go back to using a regex for simple search and your definition only makes sense for words of letters. And, like I said, I don't really want to get this complicated and figure out and document which cases should have which kind of word boundary rules (consider "don't", "qq'", "'hi'", "0x", "%s", etc.)
Like I said, Super Search will allow more control over boundaries to use with your search terms.
(but my friends call me "Tye")