Pathologically Eclectic Rubbish Lister | |
PerlMonks |
comment on |
( [id://3333]=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
I don't get what you mean here. qw/ac qw/ and qw/ca qw/ are treated identically by the flip-flop operator: Yes, I know that. Also the description on perldoc seems clear if you already know what to expect. My whole point is that the result of perl -we'my @l = qw/ca qw/; for (@l) { print if /a/../c/ }' is not logical. Suppose that I want to process html file where I have tags like this: If my flip-flop condition is /<tag>/../<\/tag>/ it would print which is not what you want. With three dots you get still not good :( Basically, what I originally (and incorrectly as I see now) expected from this operator was that it processes each element char by char (as a real flip-flop) and not as a whole. Of course, in my html example I can first format the file but that is another story. BTW: I am new here and have a question about writeup formatting. How do you cite someone's text if it contains a code? Copy-pasting and than manually putting those code tags back (which I did) seems pretty tedious. In reply to Re^4: Scalar range operator again
by kejv2
|
|