Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
good chemistry is complicated,
and a little bit messy -LW
 
PerlMonks  

Re^3: What's wrong with Perl 6?

by cog (Parson)
on May 10, 2007 at 17:03 UTC ( [id://614694]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re^2: What's wrong with Perl 6?
in thread What's wrong with Perl 6?

Well, what you say makes sense, but...

I've seen various people bash perl 6 for a variety of reasons. Some of the ones I can think of right off are

From this, I really can't say if duff is presenting what he believes are reasons for people to bash Perl 6 or if those are the reasons those people invoke... Maybe it's my English...

duff, could you please shed some light? :-)

If what jdporter says is correct, I apologize :-)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: What's wrong with Perl 6?
by duff (Parson) on May 10, 2007 at 19:18 UTC

    jdporter is correct. I guess I should have left in the paragraph where I mention that I've consumed the Perl 6 Kool-aid and have been keeping close watch on Perl's future (beyond 5.x) since before Perl 6 even existed (Who else remembers Topaz? :-)

    No worries though.

      A-ah! Everything makes sense now.

      In that case, I stand corrected, I apologize for any rudeness and I cheer your effort! :-)

      Anyway, maybe you can use my previous comments in the answers you'll compile.

      Cheers :-)

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://614694]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others admiring the Monastery: (2)
As of 2024-04-26 05:30 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found