Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Think about Loose Coupling
 
PerlMonks  

Re^2: Suggestions requested: module to standardize postal address components?

by Jenda (Abbot)
on Jul 01, 2010 at 09:40 UTC ( [id://847481]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Suggestions requested: module to standardize postal address components?
in thread Suggestions requested: module to standardize postal address components?

There also tends to be some kind of postal code, but the format of the code and the usual placement within the address differs.

Jenda
Enoch was right!
Enjoy the last years of Rome.

  • Comment on Re^2: Suggestions requested: module to standardize postal address components?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: Suggestions requested: module to standardize postal address components?
by atcroft (Abbot) on Jul 01, 2010 at 13:26 UTC

    Apparently so-after a previous suggestion about research on international formats, I found a posting where someone was *cough*talking*cough* about that most everyone uses (if I remember this correctly) a general format of the most specific part (recipient) at top to the most general (country) at bottom, but with no particular standard of ordering in between-except for a few who want to do it in the other direction.

    Because of that, my thought was (should I get that far on this as releasable code) just to provide a way to deal with parts of an address component, and let the person using it be able to call what they need where they think they need it.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://847481]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others musing on the Monastery: (2)
As of 2024-04-26 05:44 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found