Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
good chemistry is complicated,
and a little bit messy -LW

Re^3: LWP is not SIGPIPE safe?

by zwon (Monsignor)
on Nov 28, 2012 at 15:47 UTC ( #1006057=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re^2: LWP is not SIGPIPE safe?
in thread LWP is not SIGPIPE safe?

Answer to this question is in the body of the question ;) As you can see from the code it is not handling SIGPIPE itself. On the other hand nothing prevents you from setting handler in your script from which you're using LWP.

Comment on Re^3: LWP is not SIGPIPE safe?
Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: LWP is not SIGPIPE safe?
by OlegG (Monk) on Nov 28, 2012 at 16:03 UTC
    If so, then it is a bug. Because it is even not documented, that I should install sigpipe handler myself.
    Ok, it seems I should make test and report it.

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://1006057]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others meditating upon the Monastery: (6)
As of 2015-10-07 20:38 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?

    Does Humor Belong in Programming?

    Results (200 votes), past polls