|Keep It Simple, Stupid|
Re^3: Anonymous Monk?by JavaFan (Canon)
|on Jan 18, 2011 at 20:53 UTC||Need Help??|
But it exists, and it's a way for a poster to understand the authenticity and legitimacy of the comments.I understand that.
And I claim that "anonymous monk" isn't your problem. It seems you only want to read comments from people who already "have made a name". First time posters, or anyone who hasn't posted enough so their names sticks in your memory have as much authenticity and legitimacy as anonymous monks.
Which actually seem to make you a newbie basher.
And guess what. *Anyone* here, even people with thousands of posts started off as someone with no track record.
If you want to improve your perl skills, judge posts by content. Because even people with well known names, and thousands of posts do from time to time post crap. (Even those who in general post sensible things). And there have been some excellent Anonymous Monk posts.
There's one thing though. There are some people who posts a lot that still manage the time to make long rambling posts. Anonymous Monk usually keeps his posts short.
Also, forcing people to slap names on their posts doesn't create authenticity or legitimacy. Only if you can force them to come back repeatedly, and keep using said name, you have a chance they make a name for themselves. But if they post anonymously because they want to be anonymous, then can use a different name each and every time.