Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
go ahead... be a heretic
 
PerlMonks  

RE: RE: RE: RE: Deep Linkage

by BBQ (Deacon)
on Jul 21, 2000 at 18:04 UTC ( #23580=note: print w/ replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to RE: RE: RE: Deep Linkage
in thread Deep Linkage

Updated for clarity's sake, so that Aigh can understand what I'm trying to say, updates are underlined:

... and it is ridiculous to suggest that your way is automatically superior...

Well, I wasn't talking about you, Aigh, in that specific node, I was speaking on my behalf, about my beliefs. But, hey, if you, Aigh, feel the need to discuss this, why not? I'm open to diverse ideas. You, Aigh, know for a fact that I will backdown when I see a point. I've done it in the chatterbox in previous conversations between us, you and I. If you, Aigh, can make a valid statement, I will agree. What I disagree with is the automatically superior crap, I mean, if you (anyone) don't have a point (and therefor think that you (anyone) are right), then why make one at all? If its not intended as humor, I can see no use in arguing when you, Aigh, think someone else has a superior way. Does that make any sense, or did it sound like bable?

... Is it wrong of me to remove my image in protest of something I dislike? ...

Oh, do you, Aigh, mean like removing your posts when you, Aigh, see people are voting you, Aigh, down? Yes I think it's wrong. I've been wondering if you'd do that here too if people start voting you, Aigh, down. (and I beleive they have started already)

#!/home/bbq/bin/perl
# Trust no1!


Comment on RE: RE: RE: RE: Deep Linkage
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Deep Linkage
by Aighearach on Jul 22, 2000 at 00:47 UTC
    Are you sure that's all you changed?

    >If you, Aigh, can make a valid statement, I will agree

    So you are claiming, quite clearly, that my statements are invalid. Interesting that you feel qualified to ack as judge over a debate you start. But considering that you started it only with insults, it is not entirely surprising.

    >But, hey, if you, Aigh, feel the need to discuss this, why not?

    Well, lets not confuse things here. You are the one wanting to make personal attacks, and I am left defending myself. Don't try to suggest I want this exchange.

    >if you (anyone) don't have a point (and therefor think that you (anyone) are right), then why make one at all? If its not intended as humor, I can see no use in arguing when you, Aigh, think someone else has a superior way. Does that make any sense, or did it sound like bable?

    It's the same stuff, you telling people how to do it, and insisting there is only the One Way. Yes, I understand it, but no, I don't agree with it.

    In any case, you are claiming that it is wrong of me to choose what I protest. This kind of authoritarian language doesn't have a place at PerlMonks. Does it? I don't think telling people what to think should have a place anywhere that is claiming to be a "community." You shouldn't start a thread with this kind of motivation, it is dangerous to the viability of the community.

    As for claiming to know my motivations, why I would change some posts and not others, is too ridiculous to go into.

    Paris Sinclair    |    4a75737420416e6f74686572
    pariss@efn.org    |    205065726c204861636b6572
    http://sinclairinternetwork.com
    
      ...or are you saying that I do such?

      Okay, I updated the previous post for clarity. I knew it sounded like bable. Maybe its more comprehensible now. But yes, I was refering to two specific nodes you removed once they started going down: RE: RE: Re: Constant Functions and Re: Setting Retrieve Method

      Maybe removing the pic is a bit different, but nevertheless it leaves the impression that you make things "disapear" quite often when the begin to displease you. I may be wrong, but that is not what it seems.

      This kind of authoritarian language...

      Care to illustrate?

      #!/home/bbq/bin/perl
      # Trust no1!
        I find it disturbing that you are following bme arround, keeping tabs on my nodes. I will change the content of my nodes as I see fit, it is not for you to determine, and as such, you should not suggest that you have a right to so determine.

        And considering your personal insults in the root node of this thread, I think you should take some initiative, and ask that your bad, mean, node, be deleted.

        So far, you are just adding attack after attack! It wouldn't all be so bad, except that you were also harrassing me in the chatterbox, claiming to know if I voted on a node, even! You are a stalker, go stalk somebody else.

        Paris Sinclair    |    4a75737420416e6f74686572
        pariss@efn.org    |    205065726c204861636b6572
        http://sinclairinternetwork.com
        

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://23580]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others making s'mores by the fire in the courtyard of the Monastery: (5)
As of 2014-09-19 22:22 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    How do you remember the number of days in each month?











    Results (149 votes), past polls