comment on

On November 30th, 2011 you posted this node, proposing removing the anonymous monk. That proposal has been rejected by the majority of the monks. You can see this by the replies and by the reputation of that node. What makes you think that the general opinion on the topic has changed since then? (At least mine hasn't ... .)

Proposing the same again and again without a new situation or new facts doesn't look helpful to me.

Rata

In reply to Re: Once again ... is it time to get rid of the Anonymous Monk? by Ratazong
in thread Once again ... is it time to get rid of the Anonymous Monk? by sundialsvc4

Are you posting in the right place? Check out Where do I post X? to know for sure.
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags. Currently these include the following:
<code> <a> <b> <big> <blockquote> <br /> <dd> <dl> <dt> <em> <font> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6> <hr /> <i> <li> <nbsp> <ol> <p> <small> <strike> <strong> <sub> <sup> <table> <td> <th> <tr> <tt> <u> <ul>
Snippets of code should be wrapped in <code> tags not <pre> tags. In fact, <pre> tags should generally be avoided. If they must be used, extreme care should be taken to ensure that their contents do not have long lines (<70 chars), in order to prevent horizontal scrolling (and possible janitor intervention).
Want more info? How to link or How to display code and escape characters are good places to start.


No such thing as a small change
	PerlMonks