Not always true. And the OP is working on a class, and it's likely s/he will want to do more with the numbers. So rather than suggest regressing in functionality, I went with his/her architecture. :-/
The way forward always starts with a minimal test.
| [reply]
[d/l] |
Not always true. :) Sure its always true. People just think that sometimes its not but it always is :) by definition
And the OP is working on a class, and it's likely s/he will want to do more with the numbers. So rather than suggest regressing in functionality, I went with his/her architecture. :-/ Mooo! Mooo! Mooo! Your Data has no Model and no View Needs no instances to exist, therefore needs no classes to instantiate instances of OP has no moo, no bless, no class, ... OPs architecture is plain data
| [reply] |
