"be consistent" | |
PerlMonks |
Re^6: Convert undef to empty string in a hashby Anonymous Monk |
on Jan 18, 2015 at 11:59 UTC ( [id://1113655]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
The firm dismissal was warranted in my view because he was trolling. Most of what he said was deliberate nonsense -- and he knew it was nonsense -- designed to provoke an emotional response. He even owned up to that here. I owned up to no such thing. I owned up to comparing you to the that guy because you used his exact words -- as soon as I recognized the words, I went ugh -- but I had to point it out because its a real weak argument -- but that got you to stop posting on the actual topic looks wrong? DRY isn't about looks Not all ideas put forth are accurate, and exploring them isn't trolling -- resorting to ad-hominem doesn't explain anything I'll try to pick it up , the Don't repeat yourself page links to interview with authors of the book Orthogonality and the DRY Principle Dave Thomas: Most people take DRY to mean you shouldn't duplicate code. That's not its intention. Saying one version is shorter, more perlish, more clear -- that all makes sense Saying its more DRY doesn't make sense Saying the maintenance programmer goes ... thats a great topic if the exploration goes beyond "because I said so, you're a noob"
In Section
Seekers of Perl Wisdom
|
|