Re^2: With Unicode, \d is wrong if you mean [0-9]

Hmm, if you want to add one to it, it probably wants to consist of [0-9]+ rather than \d+.

Hugo

Comment on Re^2: With Unicode, \d is wrong if you mean [0-9] Select or Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^3: With Unicode, \d is wrong if you mean [0-9] by TimToady (Parson) on Oct 27, 2004 at 17:13 UTC
That could be construed as a bug in Perl's internal `grok_number()` routine.	[reply] [d/l]
Re^4: With Unicode, \d is wrong if you mean [0-9] by hv (Prior) on Oct 28, 2004 at 02:45 UTC
Patches welcome. :) If anything, I think I'd rather see things like `grok_number()` become hooks so you can intercept them, whether to augment, replace, or just add: `warn "Hey, scare's over now, you can go back to 2 digits" if $num =~ /^20\d\d\z/;` [download] Of course we probably don't reach `grok_number()` unless the lexer has already spotted a digit, so we'd need hot-pluggable grammars as well. Hugo	[reply] [d/l] [select]