"be consistent" | |
PerlMonks |
Re^14: Utter FUD!by BrowserUk (Patriarch) |
on Oct 27, 2010 at 16:41 UTC ( [id://867783]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
I would certainly say So the answer to my question is a resounding: No. You would not stand up at YAPC and make the same statement that Tye made. So why on earth is your first contribution to this site in 2 1/2 months in support of an indefensible statement made by another monk? He certainly doesn't need you to fight his battles. But I don't see how you could possibly intend that to bring this thread to a close. Simple. Because I thought that putting you the spot of having to repeat that indefensible statement would cause you to pause. It did, but not enough apparently. You continue to argue against a blanket statement. Yes. Because that is the, obviously patently untrue, statement that was made. If Tye wished to qualify it, he's had ample opportunity to do so. I may have my suspicions about his reasoning, but it is not for me to put words in his mouth. Just as I have my suspicions as to why you've suddenly popped up out of nowhere to join the argument. There -- that ends this thread! Examine what is said, not who speaks -- Silence betokens consent -- Love the truth but pardon error.
"Science is about questioning the status quo. Questioning authority".
In the absence of evidence, opinion is indistinguishable from prejudice.
In Section
Seekers of Perl Wisdom
|
|