Re: RFC Is this readable?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: RFC Is this readable? by BerntB (Deacon) on Oct 16, 2005 at 15:29 UTC
A very minor nitpick (that's about all I'm qualified for): in the section ... Oh, it is not minor. What that really means was that it wasn't understandable. It is a quite new idea, so it is useless for me to do without a good description -- otherwise people will never find it when they need it. I just wish this part of finishing this module wasn't so much like a combination of pulling teeth and pulling a tractor for hundreds of meters. :-) Sigh, I'll have to shuffle the document parts and add a description of the system to this document, too.	[reply]
Re^2: RFC Is this readable? by davidrw (Prior) on Oct 16, 2005 at 16:20 UTC
Might sound better (i catch myself doing "an xml" sometimes, too) but i believe that it is grammatically incorrect. "An" is supposed be used when the following word begins with a vowel, and "A" when the following word begins with a consonant. (There are, of course, exceptions to both because the rules are phoenetically-based.) Reference: http://owl.english.purdue.edu/handouts/esl/esliart.html `# examples of correct usage: a cat a huge cat an ostrich an underarm throw a union an honest cat` [download]	[reply] [d/l]
Re^3: RFC Is this readable? by Tanktalus (Canon) on Oct 16, 2005 at 16:28 UTC
And, because of the phonetic rules, you use "an". As in "An Ecks-Em-Ell editor". It's all about vocal pronounciation. If you pronounced "XML" as "ksml", then, sure, you would use "a" - but I don't have any idea on how to form that sound, and everyone I know pronounces "XML" by saying each letter seperately, leaving us with the leading "e" sound from "X".	[reply]
Re^4: RFC Is this readable? by jdporter (Paladin) on Oct 16, 2005 at 16:41 UTC
And for the exact same reason, it is proper to write "a URL", not "an URL" (unless, of course, you're a non-geek and you pronounce it "earl"). We're building the house of the future together.	[reply]
Re^3: RFC Is this readable? by skillet-thief (Friar) on Oct 16, 2005 at 17:48 UTC
As I suspected (but I just checked), the choice between "a" and "an" depends on phonetics and not on spelling as such. Acronyms that are pronounced letter by letter (like XML, not like NASA) are generally treated based on the pronunciation of the first letter. (The url you provided doesn't deal with the case of acronyms.) So you might as well let loose and say "an XML"... ;-) s-t PS.: here they are unequivocably for saying "an", whereas here they consider "an" more readable, but admit that some purists prefer "a"... `sub sk{ return unless $in = shift; $in =~ s!(.)$!!; print $1; sk($in)} sk("gro.alubaf@yehaf");` [download]	[reply] [d/l]
Re^4: RFC Is this readable? by BerntB (Deacon) on Oct 16, 2005 at 18:15 UTC
Thanks, I didn't know that. (I thought that English pronounciation varied too much to be a base for spelling.) To skip that little detail. If you go to my document above and read the Concepts subchapter, starting with Idea. Is that still hard to understand?	[reply]


Syntactic Confectionery Delight
	PerlMonks